Stay Granted Where Public Not At Risk

In the ongoing saga of Fitzpatrick v College of Physical Therapists of Alberta, 2019 ABCA 306 http://canlii.ca/t/j1zgj, the practitioner is seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada of an appellate court decision upholding her discipline findings. The practitioner sought to stay the discipline order until after the Supreme Court of Canada makes its decision. The Court granted the stay, indicating:

The balance of convenience favours the granting of a stay for a short period until the Supreme Court of Canada makes a determination on the leave application. The underlying allegations lean more towards administrative issues and the overall compliance or lack thereof, with the court orders. While the finding of unprofessional conduct and sanctions relate to professional disrespect, the public is not at risk during this brief interim period.

More Posts

If It Quacks Like a Duck

No one engaging in the unauthorized practice of medicine can rely “on ‘weasel words’ to avoid accountability and gloss over the substance of what [they

Let Me Count the Defences

There are many types of claims (called “causes of action”) that can be made against regulators. There are also several defences that regulators can raise

Scope of a Restraining Order

Many regulators can ask a court to direct an unregistered person to stop performing controlled acts, using a protected title, or holding themselves out as