Tweaking a Major Reform

British Columbia’s major reform of the regulation for many non-health professions is being amended ( The Professional Governance Act has been in effect for just over a year. Most of the changes are relatively minor, and include the following:

  • Updating terminology, such as changing the governing “council” to the “board”, changing “professional association” to “professional regulator”, and changing “president” to “chair”;
  • Authorizing the oversight office of the Superintendent to conduct informal inspections before determining whether a formal investigation or audit is required;
  • Requiring the regulatory bodies to pay fees to cover at least some of the cost of their oversight;
  • Reducing the ability of registrants to require the regulatory body to conduct a referendum on registrant resolutions at the annual general meeting or implement such resolutions;
  • Allowing the regulator to establish a more flexible process for administrative suspensions (e.g., for non-payment of fees);
  • Clarifying that the prohibition of reserved practices does not apply to a person exercising the rights of an Indigenous people;
  • Allowing the government to make regulations requiring registrants to make a declaration of their competence or of the existence of a conflict of interest;
  • Creating a presumptive 60-day time limit to initiate an application for judicial review of decisions made under the legislation;
  • Adjusting the process for transferring additional professions to the legislation; and
  • Eliminating the category of certified non-registrants from the legislative scheme.

This Bill demonstrates that regulatory reform is a process, not an event.

More Posts

Don’t Avoid the Hard Issues

It is human nature to avoid difficult issues. However, doing that when writing reasons for a regulatory decision can result in having to do it

When Is a Rule Targeted?

Courts tend to give deference to regulators when they enact subordinate legislation such as regulations, by-laws, or rules. So long as the provision furthers the

Exceptional Circumstances

Courts are extremely hesitant to consider a judicial review application while an administrative process is ongoing. Such applications will generally be dismissed or stayed as