Balancing Public and Private Interests

A classic example of where courts must balance the public interest in competent and ethical practice against the private interests of registrants is when registrants seek to stay a discipline order pending the outcome of their appeal.

In Cluney v. Association of Chartered Professional Accountants of Newfoundland and Labrador, 2023 NLSC 146 (CanLII), an accountant was disciplined for undisclosed matters. A sanction of a reprimand, monitoring, publication, a fine and costs was imposed. The registrant appealed and sought to stay the sanction until the appeal was determined. The Court refused.

The Court concluded that the registrant would not suffer irreparable harm if the sanction took effect immediately. There was no suspension or revocation so the registrant could continue to practise if they chose to do so. The Court said:

While it may be recognized that the publication ordered by the Tribunal could cause some reputational harm to Ms. Cluney, her circumstances do not lend themselves to supporting a stay based on this factor.  This is especially so given her decision to move from her practice as a public accountant. Instead, the potential for any harm can be remediated by requiring the CPANL to indicate, as part of its public and professional summary of the Tribunal Merits and Sanctions Decisions, that both decisions are currently under appeal by Ms. Cluney.

The Court also found that the balance of inconvenience favoured the regulator. The sanctions were not just for deterrence (which, arguably, could await the outcome of an appeal) but also included measures to ensure adequate services to clients. The Court said:

In the chartered public accountant context the loss of accountancy income and the reputational harm that would be incurred were inevitable consequences of the tribunal findings and were not exceptional circumstances that outweighed the public interest….

The Court reiterated previous cases which stated that granting a stay of a discipline order pending an appeal should only occur in exceptional circumstances.

 

More Posts

The Right to Rebut?

Many regulators frequently provide a copy of the registrant’s response to a complaint to the complainant for comment. Doing so can assist in providing the

Registration Runaround

A concern for regulators arises when applicants for registration, who are practicing elsewhere at the time, foresee disciplinary issues developing in their existing jurisdiction. A

Right-Touch Regulation Redux

Perhaps the most consequential document in professional regulation in the English-speaking world this century is Right-Touch Regulation published by the UK oversight body, the Professional

Reason Writing Omissions

Writing reasons for a regulatory decision is not easy, especially for non-lawyers. An administrative body’s reasons are the primary basis upon which a court will