Necessary and Proportional

What do you do when an elderly physician, in poor health and under enormous debt whose registration is suspended continues to practise medicine despite multiple court injunctions? This is what a Quebec court had to deal with in Collège des médecins du Québec c. Giannakis, 2020 QCCS 4216 (CanLII), http://canlii.ca/t/jc298. The evidence of contempt of court was overwhelming including a half-hour video recording of his assessing and treating an undercover investigator posing as a patient. The recording undermined his position that his poor understanding of the French language prevented him from understanding the orders made against him. In addition, his disrespect for the process was further demonstrated by his failure to show up in court for the second day of the hearing without notifying any of the other hearing participants. Despite finding a deliberate and intentional breach of the court orders, the Court in this case did not conclude that imprisonment was necessary and proportional. Rather it ordered the payment of $24,000 of fines over a 25-month period. Justice is usually not easy and is rarely neat.

More Posts

Let Me Count the Defences

There are many types of claims (called “causes of action”) that can be made against regulators. There are also several defences that regulators can raise

Scope of a Restraining Order

Many regulators can ask a court to direct an unregistered person to stop performing controlled acts, using a protected title, or holding themselves out as

Preventing Institutional Bias

Many regulators house the investigation, screening, prosecution, and adjudication of discipline matters within the same organization. Courts have consistently held that where such structures are