Another Addition to the Notice of Investigation?

A recent decision of Ontario’s Court of Appeal has added another possible item to be included in a notice to registrants that may not be on many regulators’ lists. The facts of Furtado v. Underwriter, 2024 ONCA 579 (CanLII), are complex but, in essence, the Court held that an individual did not have insurance coverage through their officers and directors liability policy because they did not promptly notify their insurer of the investigation by a regulator.

Many regulators require registrants to carry various forms of liability insurance so that clients and other members of the public have recourse if the registrant is negligent or otherwise causes financial loss. To facilitate this protection of the public, regulators may wish to consider whether their registrant notifications that they are under investigation should include a suggestion that the registrant notify their insurers about the investigation to ensure there is no loss of coverage.

More Posts

Particulars for Interim Orders

Procedural fairness and expediency are often competing concepts when it comes to whether an interim order should be imposed to protect the public while a

Prior Complaints and Prior Findings

When a discipline panel applies criminal sentencing principles at the penalty stage of a hearing, it is considered an aggravating factor to have previously been

Collaboration Is Not Conspiracy

In order to better protect the public, regulators of professions often collaborate with other regulators or government officials that have overlapping mandates. Most commonly, this

Targeting Regulatory Staff Is Costly

Applicants for registration often become frustrated when the regulator probes into areas of concern relating to their professional suitability (sometimes called “good character”). In Howell