Another Addition to the Notice of Investigation?

A recent decision of Ontario’s Court of Appeal has added another possible item to be included in a notice to registrants that may not be on many regulators’ lists. The facts of Furtado v. Underwriter, 2024 ONCA 579 (CanLII), are complex but, in essence, the Court held that an individual did not have insurance coverage through their officers and directors liability policy because they did not promptly notify their insurer of the investigation by a regulator.

Many regulators require registrants to carry various forms of liability insurance so that clients and other members of the public have recourse if the registrant is negligent or otherwise causes financial loss. To facilitate this protection of the public, regulators may wish to consider whether their registrant notifications that they are under investigation should include a suggestion that the registrant notify their insurers about the investigation to ensure there is no loss of coverage.

More Posts

Read the Fine Print

Courts are increasingly interpreting regulatory legislation with its public interest purpose and intent in mind. However, the language of the provisions still matters, as was

The Residual Category

In discipline matters, abuse of process claims are generally premised on excessive delay and require prejudice to the registrant to result in a stay of

Scrutinizing Sanctions

Discipline panels often must decide how to consider a registrant’s medical conditions or personal stress when imposing a sanction. Alberta’s highest court provided guidance on

Doré Applied

Regulators are required to respond proportionately when their public protection mandate involves imposing consequences on a registrant’s expression: Doré v. Barreau du Québec, 2012 SCC