Author: Natasha Danson

It is sometimes difficult for complainants to appreciate the role of regulators of professions when dealing with their complaints. In Gao v. Health Profession Appeal

What does it mean for courts to review a decision on the basis of reasonableness? And how does the concept of deference fit into the

Courts use the reasons of discipline tribunals as the basis for their review of the disciplinary decisions. However, that is not to say that a

The office of the Patient Ombudsman was created to facilitate accountability for health care providers. The Patient Ombudsman (which is separate from the Ontario Ombudsman’s

Regulators need to consider the freedom of expression rights of their registrants. However, regulators can infringe on those rights in a proportionate manner to achieve

It is a general principle that where a legislative scheme provides a route to challenge a regulatory decision, that route must be followed. For example,

Regulated individuals often argue that a regulator’s conduct (or inaction) amounts to an abuse of process. However, the doctrine applies equally to regulated individuals. In

The Professional Standards Authority (PSA), the oversight body for health and social care regulators in the UK, has recently published a reflective blog on its

One of the most difficult tasks for a discipline panel is assessing the credibility of witnesses, particularly in sexual misconduct cases where most of the

The decisions of many complaints screening committees are subject to scrutiny by an independent tribunal. One of the options for the reviewing tribunal is to