Welcome to the Regulation Pro Blog. SML’s blog contains brief discussions of court decisions and other developments in professional regulation, with one or two new posts per week. Explore our catalogue below or on CanLII.
Please note that the information contained in Regulation Pro is not intended to be legal advice and is not intended to be acted upon. The information contained herein is intended for general information and educational purposes only.
Remediation in Disputed Cases
Complaints’ screening committees frequently direct that the registrant participate in education and remediation. Registrants who dispute the accuracy of the complainant’s recitation of events sometimes
Understanding the Authority to Issue Interim Orders
Issuing an interim order during an investigation is an extraordinary power that can have significant consequences for the practitioner. Courts scrutinize them to ensure that
Credibility Considerations
The main issue in Caine v. Ontario College of Teachers, 2022 ONSC 2592 (CanLII), https://canlii.ca/t/jnzv7 was the discipline panel’s consideration of the credibility of witnesses.
Intimate Partner Violence is a Regulatory Issue
Many regulators view Intimate Partner Violence as a serious matter in which they have a significant role to play. For the medical profession, at least,
Discriminatory Tests Again
On the heels of Ontario Teacher Candidates’ Council v. The Queen, 2021 ONSC 7386 (CanLII), https://canlii.ca/t/jlcvg, regulators can expect more challenges to their registration examinations
New Evidence in Hearings
Hearings de novo are strange creatures of administrative law. In effect, they are a complete redoing of a prior administrative decision – by a different
Regulators Can Insist on Proper Processes Being Followed
Regulators often insist on proper processes being followed. This occurred in Williams v. Health Professions Appeal and Review Board, 2022 ONSC 2217 (CanLII), https://canlii.ca/t/jnmm0. The
Refusing to Accept Further Submissions
A core element of procedural fairness is permitting those affected by a decision to make submissions on the matter before the decision is made. However,
Duty to Accommodate a Disability as a Defence in Discipline Hearings
Can a disability constitute a substantive defence to an allegation of professional misconduct? Must discipline panels accommodate a disability when making findings? This issue came