Regulation Pro Blog

Can a regulator be liable for damages for imposing an interim suspension in good faith where the concerns/allegations are later withdrawn? In Gillis v Law

Can a party insist that individual panel members tell the party that they agree with the panel’s decision? That issue arose in Aylward v. Law

It is common for practitioners under investigation to seek full particulars and disclosure before providing their response. It is also common for investigators to not

Courts tend to be quite deferential to regulators when reviewing interim orders made to protect the public pending discipline. However, such an order was set

Dr. Al-Ghamdi, a physician, had difficulties with some of the nurses with whom he worked. He made complaints against four of them to their regulatory

Regulators have seen this scenario many times. A practitioner is referred to discipline. The practitioner brings an application for judicial review to challenge the referral

As regulators summarize complaints and discipline decisions for publication, practitioners often dispute the synopsis. This issue arose in an earlier version of Bill 87 where

For a number of years now the Courts have asserted that it will review most decisions of regulators on the basis of the reasonableness, rather

The Alberta Court of Appeal indicates that it is almost impossible to find independent legal counsel (ILC) in discipline matters liable for malicious prosecution. In