Regulation Pro Blog

Regulators offering a limited number of examination attempts face frequent requests to nullify an attempt by candidates who have been unsuccessful the maximum number of

Many regulators have a provision permitting them to not proceed with complaints that are frivolous, vexatious, made in bad faith, an abuse of process or

Yesterday an important decision was rendered by the Ontario Superior Court on the cross-border internet practice of professions. In College of Optometrists of Ontario v.

Courts sometimes provide a summary of the law that is so concise and clear that they are of enormous assistance to regulators. In The Law

In Law Society of British Columbia v Sprague, 2017 BCSC 2025 the regulator sought an injunction against Mr. Sprague for practising law. Mr. Sprague argued

Can a regulator be liable for damages for imposing an interim suspension in good faith where the concerns/allegations are later withdrawn? In Gillis v Law

Can a party insist that individual panel members tell the party that they agree with the panel’s decision? That issue arose in Aylward v. Law

It is common for practitioners under investigation to seek full particulars and disclosure before providing their response. It is also common for investigators to not

Courts tend to be quite deferential to regulators when reviewing interim orders made to protect the public pending discipline. However, such an order was set