Another Monster Case
There are some cases in which many issues are raised and dealt with. Multiple points of learning on a diversity of topics can arise. Houghton
There are some cases in which many issues are raised and dealt with. Multiple points of learning on a diversity of topics can arise. Houghton
The Divisional Court of Ontario recently ordered that an appeal of a discipline hearing proceed remotely over the objections of counsel for the practitioner. The
In College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia v Ezzati, 2020 BCSC 339, http://canlii.ca/t/j5s7k the Court had to decide what sentence to impose on
Generally the fact that a practitioner is under investigation is not made public. Only if a referral to discipline is made or significant remedial action
Some appearances of bias can be caused by the structure of the legislation. For example, where a complaint is made about a member of the
Should there ever be limits to a regulator’s access to a practitioner’s client files when the files are relevant to an investigation? Almost never is
A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal has provided additional guidance about making findings on credibility. In R. v Esquivel-Benitez, 2020 ONCA 160,
Few regulatory decisions have as significant an impact on individuals as clinical examinations, especially for an examinee’s final attempt. In Mattar v The National Dental
For almost two decades the case of Finney v Barreau du Québec, 2004 SCC 36, http://canlii.ca/t/1h87m has caused regulators to wonder in what circumstances a
The Ontario government has just issued an emergency order, retroactive to March 16, 2020, suspending all limitation periods and timelines in proceedings. Regulators generally deal