Author: Natasha Danson

Presumptive Prematurity

Courts are more frequently requiring parties to complete the administrative process before seeking a judicial remedy. A prime example is found in Gill v. College

Read More »

Proving Standards of Practice

When an allegation is made that a practitioner failed to meet the standard of practice of the profession, the evidence often consists of both published

Read More »

Adding Allegations Mid-Hearing

It is a fundamental principle that a practitioner should know the allegations (and case) they will meet before their discipline hearing starts. Some exceptions exist

Read More »

Focus on the Allegations!

It is trite to say that a discipline panel can only make findings in respect of the allegations contained in the notice of hearing document.

Read More »

Usurping the Role of the Courts?

Regulators sometimes address conduct by practitioners that are also being addressed by the courts. For example, a practitioner can be disciplined for sexual abuse and

Read More »

Take it to the Tribunal First

A Newfoundland and Labrador court has again affirmed the importance of raising appearance of bias concerns with a hearing panel before taking the issue to

Read More »

Penalty Again

Given the principle of proportionality (i.e., that the sanction in discipline cases should be relatively consistent), it is often difficult to raise the range of

Read More »