Sentencing Considerations for Contempt of Court for Holding Out and Use of Title

Home » Sentencing Considerations for Contempt of Court for Holding Out and Use of Title

In College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia v Ezzati, 2020 BCSC 339, http://canlii.ca/t/j5s7k the Court had to decide what sentence to impose on an unregistered person who held themselves out as able to practise medicine and used protected titles such as “physician” and “Doctor”. The Court identified the following factors as relevant to that decision:

the gravity of the offence (in this case disregarding a court order);
the need to deter the offender;
the past record and character of the offender (e.g., is this a first finding);
the need to protect the public from the offender’s conduct;
the ability of the offender to pay a fine; and
the “extent to which the breach was flagrant and wilful and intended to defy the court’s authority”.

In applying those considerations to the conduct of this individual, the Court imposed a fine of $5,000.

Another Addition to the Notice of Investigation?

A recent decision of Ontario’s Court of Appeal has added another possible item to be included in a notice to registrants that may not be

A New Criterion for Evaluating Regulators

There is an increasing tendency to evaluate the performance of regulators of professions. Most of these evaluations are conducted by oversight bodies, such as the

Don’t Avoid the Hard Issues

It is human nature to avoid difficult issues. However, doing that when writing reasons for a regulatory decision can result in having to do it

When Is a Rule Targeted?

Courts tend to give deference to regulators when they enact subordinate legislation such as regulations, by-laws, or rules. So long as the provision furthers the