Sentencing Considerations for Contempt of Court for Holding Out and Use of Title

Home » Sentencing Considerations for Contempt of Court for Holding Out and Use of Title

In College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia v Ezzati, 2020 BCSC 339, http://canlii.ca/t/j5s7k the Court had to decide what sentence to impose on an unregistered person who held themselves out as able to practise medicine and used protected titles such as “physician” and “Doctor”. The Court identified the following factors as relevant to that decision:

the gravity of the offence (in this case disregarding a court order);
the need to deter the offender;
the past record and character of the offender (e.g., is this a first finding);
the need to protect the public from the offender’s conduct;
the ability of the offender to pay a fine; and
the “extent to which the breach was flagrant and wilful and intended to defy the court’s authority”.

In applying those considerations to the conduct of this individual, the Court imposed a fine of $5,000.

Notices of Meetings

The requirement to give notice of meetings in which policy issues will be discussed is not as rigorous as the requirement to give notice of

Careful How You Word Your Reconsideration Rules

Finality of disciplinary decisions is important for the regulator, hearing participants, and the public. The significance of that principle is illustrated in Tan v. Ontario

Read the Fine Print

Courts are increasingly interpreting regulatory legislation with its public interest purpose and intent in mind. However, the language of the provisions still matters, as was

The Residual Category

In discipline matters, abuse of process claims are generally premised on excessive delay and require prejudice to the registrant to result in a stay of